[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
fusermount vs fusermount3
From: |
Stephen Gildea |
Subject: |
fusermount vs fusermount3 |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2021 05:33:46 -0700 |
Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Separately, I see that tramp-fuse-unmount runs program "fusermount3".
> > My system has only "fusermount" installed, so, if this function were
> > to be called, it would fail for me.
>
> Well, fusermount3 is recommend on the sshfs pages. If fusermount works
> for you similar, I could check which of the commands is installed, and
> call it respectively.
Using fusermount worked for me. I gave it the same arguments
tramp-fuse would have used with fusermount3:
fusermount -u /tmp/tramp.sshfs.remotehost
I tested this on Ubuntu 20.04, which has fuse package 2.9.9-3.
- new file is not seen as remote, (continued)
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/03
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/04
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Stephen Gildea, 2021/10/04
- Re: Tramp never unmounts sshfs volumes, Michael Albinus, 2021/10/05
fusermount vs fusermount3,
Stephen Gildea <=