octave-maintainers archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ Boolean: 241 ]

Total 241 documents matching your query.

1. Re: GSoC '16 - Boolean Operations on Polygons : Merge Code to geometry Package (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 10:46:04 +0200
That will be great. It is an orderly package structure, src contains source files.
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-08/msg00210.html (17,383 bytes)

2. Re: GSoC '16 - Boolean Operations on Polygons : Merge Code to geometry Package (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 11:09:00 +0000
From: Juan Pablo Carbajal-2 [via Octave] <ml-node+address@hidden> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 9:08 AM To: AMR_KELEG Subject: Re: GSoC '16 - Boolean Operations on Polygons : Merge Code to geometry P
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-08/msg00166.html (26,618 bytes)

3. Re: GSOC Project "Implement boolean operations on polygons" GNU Octave (score: 36)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 23:53:25 +0100
pr.nienhuis@ albumihaiupb@ Hello, My name is Albu Mihai and I am a student at University Politehnica of Bucharest, more exactly at Computers and Information Technology. I want to work at Google Summ
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-03/msg00272.html (14,733 bytes)

4. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 14:32:42 +0100
There is also an algorithm for boolean operations on polygons by Francisco Martínez del Río (http://www4.ujaen.es/~fmartin/bool_op.html). Hi put his C++ code in public domain and also provides an i
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00126.html (12,378 bytes)

5. Re: GSoC '16 - Boolean Operations on Polygons : Merge Code to geometry Package (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 06:46:53 +0000
Dear Juan, I can easily move the include directory from the root path of the package to the src directory. Will this be more convenient to you? Amr From: Juan Pablo Carbajal-2 [via Octave] <ml-node+a
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-08/msg00208.html (17,779 bytes)

6. Re: GSOC Project "Implement boolean operations on polygons" GNU Octave (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 13:51:32 -0700
I have experience with Boost::Geometry, ClipperLib, and GPC. Now that you mention it, I remember the integer limitation with ClipperLib. I only needed 3 digits of precision for my applications, so I
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-03/msg00271.html (11,422 bytes)

7. Re: GSOC Project "Implement boolean operations on polygons" GNU Octave (score: 35)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 12:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
Last summer I stumbled upon a comparison of various polygon clipping libraries (5 or 6 IIRC) by a Russian (?) guy which outlined that only 2 or 3 could handle holes. (Too bad I can't find that URL an
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-03/msg00270.html (10,084 bytes)

8. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:30:49 -0700
On Mar 17, 2017, at 1:53 PM, Philip Nienhuis <address@hidden> wrote: I have been trying the Boost version by Amr for some time, using Amr's unofficial geometry-3.0.0 version from github and the mappi
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00268.html (9,842 bytes)

9. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 08:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Sir, I'm Leo Yi, a sophomore in Computer science at Peking University, China. And I’m the very one who mailed to you personally instead of to the mailing list. Do you enjoy OctConf 2017? I’ve bee
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00264.html (7,436 bytes)

10. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 18:20:34 +0100
Yes, you are in the right track. Do check already exiisting oct-files to see how to do it. For example check the current geometry package development. You can also see other packages like fem-fenics.
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00146.html (9,339 bytes)

11. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 05:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
Sir, I read CGAL Manual about implementation of boolean operations for simple and relatively simple polygons and polygon with holes. Now , to create a C++ interface in Octave for the same, I read som
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00139.html (8,406 bytes)

12. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:53:59 +0100
2017-03-08 16:52 GMT+01:00 José Luis García Pallero <address@hidden>: The documentation shows some examples: http://doc.cgal.org/latest/Boolean_set_operations_2/index.html -- ** José Luis García
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00070.html (11,106 bytes)

13. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:52:17 +0100
2017-03-08 16:40 GMT+01:00 Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>: Hello: OctCLIP is an implementation of the Greiner-Hormann algorithm (http://davis.wpi.edu/~matt/courses/clipping/), which is a NON RO
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00069.html (9,927 bytes)

14. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:40:50 +0100
Hi, We tried to merge octclip in the past but due to maintainers decision we rever it to two different packages. We can add a wrapper in the gometry package that calls octclip boolean functions if ne
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00068.html (8,463 bytes)

15. Re: Contribution to Project : Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:58:54 +0100
Dear Piyush Jain, There is some clipper functionality already added to geometry. Maybe you can extend that somehow? Currently we use it only for orinetatin of polygons. Philip Neuhuis can guide you b
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00051.html (5,634 bytes)

16. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:06:02 +0100
Hi Richard, I use CGAl without much troubles but I will check the links. I think the philosophy is to provide bindings many bindings and let the user choose which one they use. We will have low level
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00045.html (12,548 bytes)

17. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:03:48 +0000
On 04/03/17 23:13, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote: On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:14 PM, PhilipNienhuis <address@hidden> wrote: abhishek singla wrote My name is Abhishek Singla. I am interested in working on th
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00044.html (10,804 bytes)

18. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 00:13:04 +0100
Hi, Exactly as Phillip said, the interaciont with boost has to be more clever. If you want to move in another direction, binding to CGAL[1] would be another option. This will also allows us to have m
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00040.html (8,913 bytes)

19. Re: GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 09:14:09 -0800 (PST)
The description of this project needs to be adapted. Last year most of this has already been implemented (by Amr Keleg who did good work), but not yet integrated into the geometry or mapping package.
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00037.html (7,643 bytes)

20. GSoC 2017 - Implement boolean operations on polygons (score: 34)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2017 15:04:09 +0530
My name is Abhishek Singla. I am interested in working on the idea " Implement boolean operations on polygons".  I have knowledge of C++ and have also used octave as part of my curriculum in subjec
/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2017-03/msg00034.html (6,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu