bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Fwd: Re: md5 sum for bearoff databases (score: 181)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:22:11 +0200
On 09/21/2011 10:00 PM, Michael Petch wrote: On 21/09/2011 12:31 PM, Johannes Bickmann wrote: Hello list! I'm a new member in this list. I recognized that the md5-sums of my generated bearoff databas
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2011-09/msg00027.html (6,502 bytes)

102. Re: [Bug-gnubg] md5 sum for bearoff databases (score: 181)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:57:40 -0600
Those files I believe are slightly different than the form used now so they won't match what is produced locally by you. Usually you can tell if the database and neural net files are loaded properly
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2011-09/msg00026.html (6,268 bytes)

103. [Bug-gnubg] Re: more on bearoff databases (score: 180)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:46:09 -0600
Embedded comments inside prefaced by (NK) -- Original Message -- From: "Joern Thyssen" <address@hidden> To: "GNU Backgammon Bugs" <address@hidden> Cc: "Neil Kaz" <address@hidden> Sent: Sunday, Octobe
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00325.html (10,452 bytes)

104. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: more on bearoff databases (score: 179)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:42:59 +0100
What if we combine the two approaches? 1) Build a OSR database using the mean and std 2) Compare this to the full database that you are generating and for each position, generate a metric on how good
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00336.html (11,737 bytes)

105. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: more on bearoff databases (score: 177)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 13:21:04 -0600
New comments prefaced by (KAZ) -- Original Message -- From: "Joern Thyssen" <address@hidden> To: "Neil Kaz" <address@hidden> Cc: "GNU Backgammon Bugs" <address@hidden> Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2002
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00327.html (8,256 bytes)

106. Re: [Bug-gnubg] more than 2 double sided bearoff databases (score: 173)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 19:48:09 -0600
Regarding bearoff databases, GNUBG supports only 1 two sided bearoff database and 1 one-sided bearoff database at any given time. As for the file naming convention and other info that may help you, y
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-09/msg00003.html (5,411 bytes)

107. [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff dbs (score: 173)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:07:41 +0100
Hi all, just noticed this, in the "Evaluation engine" details (Help/About/Evaluation engine): * Contact neural network evaluator: - version 0.15, 250 inputs, 128 hidden units. * Crashed neural networ
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-01/msg00010.html (6,180 bytes)

108. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Large bearoff databases (was: Huge evaluation difference) (score: 172)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:18:12 +0100
I suppose it helps that the opponent's position is a few-rolls position and more balanced long races would not do as well. Yes! There it actually two ways to do the dynamic programming of two sided
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2019-03/msg00012.html (11,858 bytes)

109. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Large bearoff databases (was: Huge evaluation difference) (score: 172)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 17:14:52 +0100
I suppose it helps that the opponent's position is a few-rolls position and more balanced long races would not do as well. Yes! There it actually two ways to do the dynamic programming of two sided
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2019-03/msg00011.html (11,018 bytes)

110. RE: [Bug-gnubg] documentation: I don't understand the usage of thebear-off-database (score: 172)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 00:34:58 +0200
Frank, Hugh Sconyers’ "BEAROFF EQUITIES AND BACKGAME PROBABILITIES" [1] is a commerical product ($100) and consists of 12 DVD. It is not related to the database you downloaded, which in no way can r
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2005-05/msg00038.html (6,511 bytes)

111. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff dB position, few questions (score: 171)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:39:32 +0200
On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Massimiliano Maini <address@hidden> wrote:       GNU Backgammon  Position ID: 6AUAADoDAAAAAA                     Match ID   : UQkAAAAAAAAA     +24-23
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-06/msg00230.html (11,582 bytes)

112. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Clarification / Point of Understanding - Cube Analysis (Cubebful checker evals and the bearoff DB) (score: 169)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:25:21 +0200
I think we discussed this a while ago: cubeless winning chances in match play are taken from the 2s dB, janowski formula converts them into cubefull then plies are applied. Hence cubeless winning cha
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-08/msg00361.html (7,099 bytes)

113. [Bug-gnubg] Clarification / Point of Understanding - Cube Analysis (Cubebful checker evals and the bearoff DB) (score: 169)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:16:06 -0600
There has been a significant amount of discussion on BGO about this position of Neil¹s. http://www.bgonline.org/forums/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;read=47213 Position ID: gwEAQCoAAAAAAA Match ID: cAmg
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2009-08/msg00356.html (5,937 bytes)

114. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff.c error (score: 169)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:12:10 -0800
hi I have some new info. if I use eval threads = 1, the match finishes without any problem. if I use eval threads = 2, the gnu crashes with error message below. this is on a dual processor intel 930
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-11/msg00067.html (5,809 bytes)

115. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff.c error (score: 169)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:13:39 +0100
The most common reason is that the bearoff database has been downloaded onto a Windows machine as an ASCII rather than a binary file. The will produce a corrupt file (every occurrence of a byte with
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-11/msg00065.html (5,346 bytes)

116. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff databases (score: 168)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:56:17 +0000
I don't think makebearoff will successfully create files larger than 6 * 11, although it's not the file size itself that is the problem, as I understand it. When I tried it (years ago now), it ran in
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-07/msg00010.html (6,458 bytes)

117. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: more on bearoff databases (score: 168)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:06:15 +0000
Unfortunately there are 10M positions with 13 chequers on 13 points, and 15 positions with 2 chequers on five points, hence a total of 150M positions. I keep the mean and the variance for the roll di
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00326.html (7,312 bytes)

118. [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff anomaly(bug?) (score: 165)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 22:53:48 -0600
Before beginning. 1) Go to Settings menu/Players. Set Player 0 as GNU Backgammon at and Expert Level. Player 1 should be human 2) Go to Settings/Analysis. Uncheck "Same as Analysis" and select Expert
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-10/msg00010.html (8,119 bytes)

119. RE: [Bug-gnubg] New formula for estimating bearoff GWC (score: 165)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:37:04 +0200
Hello Ian, thank you for your answer. A nice catalogue of questions. This is the style of constructive discussion I was looking for. A short preamble to the history of my work. I decided to improve
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-06/msg00129.html (11,417 bytes)

120. Re: [Bug-gnubg] gammon rate in bearoff situations (score: 165)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2002 06:37:15 +1300
No magic involved here. getBearoffGammonProbs takes the position of the side wanting to bear one checker. (Since it is a bearoff, all other 19 points are know to be empty, so only 6 are needed). It
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00061.html (7,534 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu