bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [Bug-gnubg] gammon rate in bearoff situations (score: 165)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 07:56:17 +0000
I do exactly the same for the bearoff-databases. Besided storing the probabilities for bearing off all chequers the probabilities for bearing at least one chequer off are stored. Extremely good gammo
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00057.html (6,841 bytes)

122. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Strange bearoff analysis (score: 164)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 06:39:12 +0000
Hmm, at work... Since the position you posted is from the in-memory two-sided bearoff database and doesn't use neural net, you can check MD5 checksums of the database. The correct checksums are in th
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-06/msg00219.html (5,884 bytes)

123. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff DB bug? (score: 164)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 12:43:58 +0000
gnubg is using the one-sided database for this position (gnubg_os0.bd). It could be one of those positions where the one-sided bearoff database is wrong. I'l check with my larger two sided one when I
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00170.html (5,295 bytes)

124. Re: [Bug-gnubg] bearoff equity bug (score: 161)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 20:17:48 +0000
This was a bug in some code I committed Sunday. There is nothing wrong with the bearoff databases, this was a bug in the evaluation routine. I've committed a fix now. Jørn
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00088.html (5,670 bytes)

125. Re: [Bug-gnubg] gammon rate in bearoff situations (score: 161)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 06:43:42 +1300
No magic involved here. getBearoffGammonProbs takes the position of the side wanting to bear one checker. (Since it is a bearoff, all other 19 points are know to be empty, so only 6 are needed). It r
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-11/msg00056.html (6,518 bytes)

126. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: more on bearoff databases (score: 161)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 19:52:52 +0000
In the normal one-sided bearoff databases we store an array of probabilities: the probability to bear off in 0 moves, in 1 move, in 2 moves etc etc. For example, GNU Backgammon Position ID: qm3bAADMX
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00328.html (10,388 bytes)

127. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff databases (score: 160)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:42:38 -0600
Makebearoff will create databases bigger than 2gb but GNUBG apparently can't use them. As far as I am aware at this point in time the 2gb limit is still an issue. As you know there is a caveat in the
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-07/msg00009.html (5,474 bytes)

128. [Bug-gnubg] Bearoff databases (score: 160)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:32:09 -0500
Hi, I was wondering if I can get a two sided Bearoff database that is bigger than 6x11. Makebearoff won't create any two sided database bigger than 2GB. If such a database was available on a disk I w
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-07/msg00008.html (4,387 bytes)

129. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Cubeful equities in bearoff (score: 160)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 20:55:55 +0000
The new 5MB dataase (http://users.skynet.be/bk228456/gnubg_ts0.exe) covers 6 chequers on 6 points. There is source code for a program that can generate larger databases (I'm don't think it's included
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00018.html (6,038 bytes)

130. [Bug-gnubg] more on bearoff databases (score: 160)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 10:06:58 +0000
Hi all, I'm in the process of generating one-sided bearoff databases for gnubg. The bearoff databases generated contains probabilities for bearing off and the probabilities for bearing more than one
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-10/msg00324.html (7,757 bytes)

131. [Bug-gnubg] BUG: Crash using one-sided database on disk (score: 159)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:21:14 +0100
Gnubg exits with no warning when I am setting up a position, or reaches a position during play. It occurs when the position is outside the in-memory db, but within the one-sided db on disk. For insta
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-04/msg00301.html (6,784 bytes)

132. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Idea for encoding 2-sided database (score: 158)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:46:35 +0200
I've had a look - the one sided bearoff db can have two forms: Uncompressed (every position has a full entry - either 64 bytes or 128 bytes, containing 32/64 float values (64 if gammon probabilities
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2005-03/msg00086.html (9,457 bytes)

133. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Bug: 1-sided database (score: 157)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:47:29 -0400
As an interesting side note I was actually in doubt how to handle gammons in the one sided database. When the database is generated the best moves are found by selecting the move with the lowest ave
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-09/msg00575.html (7,083 bytes)

134. [Bug-gnubg] Large bearoff databases (was: Huge evaluation difference) (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:32:45 +0100
I suppose it helps that the opponent's position is a few-rolls position and more balanced long races would not do as well. Would it be usable as is with the current gnubg ? Would any file larger than
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2019-03/msg00010.html (6,836 bytes)

135. RE: [Bug-gnubg] RE: Links to bearoff and hypergammon databases are down. (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 09:30:22 +0100
Thanks Mishkin, I have successfully downloaded the three-chequer hypergammon database from the link below. The link at http://gnubg.org/index.php?startpos=10 "One-sided race database reaches the midp
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2010-05/msg00006.html (7,762 bytes)

136. RE: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and2-sided? (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 04:29:37 -0500
Ned, Your one-sided database is called gnubg_os10.bd. It should be gnubg_os.bd. Not that I've done anything like this myself, of course ;o) --Ian
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00264.html (5,100 bytes)

137. Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and 2-sided? (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 07:33:19 +0000
No, but you write "gnubg_os10.bd(12/4/2002)". You should rename the file to "gnubg_os.bd" .-) Jørn
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00263.html (6,785 bytes)

138. Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and 2-sided? (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 01:07:38 -0800
large 1-sided bearoff db, just the two in memory and the large version of the 2-sided db. 1-sided db? That's what I thought from reading gnubg's output from amalysis/evaluation engine. However, the
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00262.html (6,174 bytes)

139. Re: [Bug-Gnubg] Bearoff Databases...Does GNUbg see both 1-sided and 2-sided? (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 06:14:26 +0000
gnubg_ts0.bd and gnubg_os0.bd are read into memory. gnubg_ts.bd and gnubg_os.bd are read from disk. Jørn
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00260.html (5,934 bytes)

140. [Bug-gnubg] bearoff equity bug (score: 156)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 11:21:09 -0800
Build 02Dec01, WinME. (with "perfect" bearoff db gnubg_ts0.bd dated Dec01, size 6671kb). I'd thought the bearoff problems had cleared up after I reloaded the program and database with the late Dec01
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2002-12/msg00081.html (10,259 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu