bug-gnubg archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ bearoff: 835 ] [ database: 1320 ]

Total 438 documents matching your query.

381. [Bug-gnubg] Compilation of gnubg on Cygwin (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 12:59:00 +0200
Hi, I am trying to compile the gnubg on cygwin 1.5, using the gnubg sources included in the cygwin distribution (I did a full installation of cygwin, which includes all available packages). I am foll
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-07/msg00169.html (11,417 bytes)

382. Re: [Bug-gnubg] checking cubeful or not makes a difference when it shouldn't (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 22:50:03 +0200
It sounds strange, but please provide a __minimal__ example of the problem. Including position and match id's and the settings you change. Note that even though it is an initial position a specific p
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-07/msg00128.html (6,346 bytes)

383. [Bug-gnubg] checking cubeful or not makes a difference when it shouldn't (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:34:34 -0400
I rolled out a one point match using player 0 as advanced and player 1 as expert. I had the advanced player on turn and used the rollout as initial position option. In one rollout I checked cubeful u
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-07/msg00127.html (5,572 bytes)

384. RE: [Bug-gnubg] new windows build (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2007 11:23:47 +0200
The multi-thread exe: gnubg crashes after a rollout Settings - Options - Other: Eval Threads 2 Start match - my turn to move - Ctrl + H - roll out n moves A window pops up: ** ERROR **: file bearoff
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-07/msg00056.html (5,544 bytes)

385. [Bug-gnubg] Why is it a sanity check for one sided bearoffs? (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 16:58:46 +0200
Hi all! I'm trying to do some cleanup in the code while I'm reading for my exams, and then I stumble into a question that I can't find any answer to... Why does the one-sided bearoff database evaluat
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-05/msg00031.html (4,599 bytes)

386. [Bug-gnubg] Display error in EPC screen (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 13:50:12 -0500
Position ID: bXcHAAB3AAAAAA Match ID: QQkAACAAQAAA Effective pip count from one-sided bearoff database: Player Opponent EPC 26.994 64.413 Pip count 15 56 Wastage 11.994 8.413 Estimated gwc: 0.9986 (o
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2007-02/msg00050.html (4,432 bytes)

387. Re: [Bug-gnubg] 0ply doubles early (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 21:23:44 +0100
On 12/15/06, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote: I understand your frustration with gnubg not handling the cube as well as you think it should at those "simple" or "straightforward" situations. Well
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-12/msg00024.html (10,803 bytes)

388. Re: [Bug-gnubg] 0ply doubles early (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 07:59:51 +1300
I understand your frustration with gnubg not handling the cube as well as you think it should at those "simple" or "straightforward" situations. Yet I do not think the situation is simple. race is si
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-12/msg00023.html (10,869 bytes)

389. [Bug-gnubg] Rollout stats & bug ? (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:03:46 +0200
Hi all, I've a (potentially silly) question about rollout stats. I have this position : GNU Backgammon Position ID: 1wwAAH4HAAAAAA Match ID : UgngACAAAAAA +13-14-15-16-17-18--19-20-21-22-23-24-+ O: g
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-08/msg00034.html (7,002 bytes)

390. [Bug-gnubg] Re: OS/X Tiger Builds: 3dboards Issue (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 17:14:30 -0600
Howdy, After generating the initial release of OS/X yesterday (using latest CVS head), I decided to investigate the 3d problem. The issue is seems related to X server (Although similar thing occurs i
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-04/msg00091.html (25,709 bytes)

391. [Bug-gnubg] OS/X Tiger Builds (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 18:56:37 -0600
Hello All, Last week I ended up working with Eli on the Solaris platform builds and then it was Easter this weekend. So I was unavailable to look at the OS/X stuff. I will probably update these build
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2006-04/msg00088.html (5,191 bytes)

392. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Wrong move in external interface (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:33:41 +0100
D'oh! I'm so silly! I didn't use the two sided bearoff database! As you state in your first post it does work then. I'll start the bug hunt then.... -Øystein -- The information contained in this me
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2005-03/msg00038.html (6,377 bytes)

393. Fw: [Bug-gnubg] No Go (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 08:39:56 -0800
Thanks for your response Jim. address@hidden:~> script capture Script started, file is capture address@hidden:~> gnubg -t GNU Backgammon 0.14.3-devel Copyright 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 by G
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-11/msg00140.html (6,354 bytes)

394. [Bug-gnubg] xml2 linking and bison on Windows (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 21:45:37 +0100
Hi all, After some time I tried to compile again: gcc -o gnubg analysis.o bearoff.o bearoffgammon.o boardpos.o copying.o credits.o database.o dice.o drawboard.o erf.o eval.o export.o external.o exter
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-11/msg00091.html (5,922 bytes)

395. Re: [Bug-gnubg] new rpms (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 18:12:15 +0200
Hi, I've successfully build gnubg with 3d support here on by system, however it doesn't work as smooth and fine as it does on the Windows side, so I think you might as well leave the 3d support out.
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-09/msg00001.html (5,796 bytes)

396. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Question about higher plies (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 12:47:48 +0000
Any n-ply evaluation consists of a (large) number of neural net evaluations (0-ply evaluation or static evaluation). The algorithm for a static neural net evaluation is simply: (a) determine type of
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-07/msg00080.html (6,328 bytes)

397. Re : [Bug-gnubg] Question Re: 040617 build & gnubg.gtkrc (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:42:54 +0200
I've noticed the same thing (Win XP and NT) : the window looks weird. The icons on the toolbar are a bit too big (they hide the toolbar border) and the font is different (worse). I've 4 gif showing
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2004-06/msg00159.html (6,031 bytes)

398. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Promoting gnubg (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 22:12:52 +0100
the be I wasn't thinking of gnubg.org for the big ones, but Jim's server space. interested Yes please :-) I agree with centralizing the downloads. Yet, the big files (if they are made available) are
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-11/msg00097.html (6,524 bytes)

399. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Promoting gnubg (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 21:04:35 +0100
* Christopher D. Yep wrote on 11 Nov 2003: There are probably a substantial number of backgammon players who have never heard of gnubg or who are intimidated of downloading/installing files over the
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-11/msg00095.html (9,261 bytes)

400. Re: [Bug-gnubg] Promoting gnubg (score: 9)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:38:02 +0100
Bandwidth isn't a problem here (ISP Skynet.be, don't know about gnubg.org), but I am limited to 50 MB storage space. The one and two sided bearoff databases (the bigger ones) would be of interest for
/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2003-11/msg00093.html (8,967 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu