info-cvs archive search

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ rcs: 2660 ] [ keywords: 324 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

1. RCS keywords (score: 386)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: 11 Jul 2006 08:35:08 -0700
All, I use RCS via Emacs and really like what RCS does for me. However, is there a way to add a keyword to RCS? What I want to do is to be able to add a program description to my RCS files so that it
/archive/html/info-cvs/2006-07/msg00048.html (4,571 bytes)

2. Re: problem with keywords in XML files (score: 247)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:49:48 -0700
Works fine thanks - with ": " after "Log", of course. Not necessary. CVS will insert the colon. Actually, Log is one keyword that really is more trouble than it's worth, for several reasons. First, i
/archive/html/info-cvs/2005-10/msg00246.html (6,845 bytes)

3. Re: CVS:Embedding information with keywords (score: 233)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:00:26 +0200
Hello, Did you try $Id$? CVS understands all RCS keywords. Regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/
/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-10/msg00233.html (4,687 bytes)

4. Re: Avoiding \040 in filenames within keywords (score: 226)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:22:13 -0400
I've since read that \040 is used for spaces to keep the keyword string "well formed" for the benefit of keyword search tools. It appears that dollar signs will also be replaced. However, I don't nee
/archive/html/info-cvs/2005-07/msg00258.html (6,325 bytes)

5. Re: CVS, RCS, System Files (score: 182)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 00:52:25 +0000 (UTC)
Yes, it is routine. You can even use RCS and CVS at the same time on the same project, they will mostly ignore one another. I maintain my system files through RCS all the time. What I do is create a
/archive/html/info-cvs/2004-12/msg00046.html (6,230 bytes)

6. RE: A couple of features in RCS that CVS lacks... why? (score: 179)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 13:58:17 -0700
Tags can be used as a STATE substitute, however the nice thing about STATEs is that it's much easier to revert to a last known good state, for example. With tags, however, once you've moved your tag,
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-08/msg00156.html (10,501 bytes)

7. Re: A couple of features in RCS that CVS lacks... why? (score: 175)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 19:57:28 -0400 (EDT)
[ On Friday, July 27, 2001 at 13:48:25 (-0700), Josh Baudhuin wrote: ] RCS "states" are far far less useful in CVS than they can be in RCS. That's because CVS already uses the RCS state for "magic" i
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-07/msg01082.html (9,370 bytes)

8. RE: A couple of features in RCS that CVS lacks... why? (score: 148)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:55:58 -0700
D'uh woops. It occurs to me that the -T was not what was keeping us from having to recompile--it was because our wrapper script reset the committed (ci'd) file to the timestamp it had before the ci o
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-07/msg01077.html (7,842 bytes)

9. A couple of features in RCS that CVS lacks... why? (score: 144)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2001 13:48:25 -0700
There are a couple of things in RCS that CVS doesn't have any longer (i.e., since cvs-1.10) that I find a little odd and vexing. First off, I'd expect that the update and commit command would have co
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-07/msg01076.html (6,483 bytes)

10. Bug or known weakness in CVS RCS-keyword expansion? (score: 132)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:24:16 +0200 (CEST)
Hi all If you have two files a.txt (two lines) : -- $Id: $ $Name: $ -- b.txt (one line) -- $Name: $ -- Add those to CVS - check out the module and run "cvs tag TAG1" Then $ echo "hi there" >> a.txt $
/archive/html/info-cvs/2006-07/msg00053.html (6,365 bytes)

11. Re: The hated $Log$ keyword (score: 123)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:12:30 -0400 (EDT)
[ On Monday, July 9, 2001 at 00:01:01 (-0400), Eric Siegerman wrote: ] Well, with CVS the meaning of "frozen" file is quite a bit different. In the most basic sense what I'm saying is that "-kv" shou
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-07/msg00190.html (16,300 bytes)

12. sccs2rcs to perl (score: 115)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 18:12:20 -0500 (EST)
My monthly resend of this script. I guess I'll include the script directly this time in the hopes that maybe people don't like attachments and that's the reason I still haven't gotten a response from
/archive/html/info-cvs/2002-03/msg00273.html (19,393 bytes)

13. $DateZone: (ZONE)$ (was RE: $DateLocal$) (score: 78)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 19:28:59 +0900
I come again, implement `$DateZone: (ZONENAME)$'. In this implementation, a writer specifies the timezone. Then, the behavior is a place-independent. A problem of this implementation is the literal Z
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-06/msg00659.html (15,026 bytes)

14. Re: GPG-Signed Commits proposal (score: 74)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:40:12 +0200
I realize that the follow-up I sent a week or two ago didn't made it to the list :/ Please find here some comments to your reply, then my original follow-up :) Sounds good :) I had in mind to sign wh
/archive/html/info-cvs/2005-08/msg00382.html (13,589 bytes)

15. Re: Annotate of Log output wrong (score: 73)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:04:26 -0500
See my reply to your 'Inaccurate documentation re "cvs tag"'. commit does an update to keep things consistent between your sandbox and the repo when it gets done. BTW I think you should stop thinking
/archive/html/info-cvs/2005-07/msg00125.html (12,298 bytes)

16. RE: [patch #4573] Fix for keyword expansion problem/mis-feature during commit (score: 71)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:02:41 +1100
Rehul, I've removed bug-cvs from the list of recipients since I do not think it is related to this discussion. I've forwarded your comments on the patch to our development manager, but I would sugges
/archive/html/info-cvs/2006-02/msg00121.html (18,609 bytes)

17. Re: [patch #4573] Fix for keyword expansion problem/mis-feature during commit (score: 71)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:06:53 -0800
Hello Arthur : See response below: Arthur Barrett wrote: Rahul and Patrick, T In particular your original patch was not suitable for inclusion in CVSNT (or probably for cvs 1.12) as it has a hardcode
/archive/html/info-cvs/2006-02/msg00119.html (13,587 bytes)

18. Re: The hated $Log$ keyword (score: 69)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 00:01:01 -0400
Mmm, yes. If it stripped out the values at commit time, and just stored the keywords, all these *#(! merge conflicts would go away. Why is this a problem? I very much prefer it. Suppose, using SCCS o
/archive/html/info-cvs/2001-07/msg00185.html (8,430 bytes)

19. Upcoming dynamic CVSADM patch - 1 workspace >1 repositories for each file (score: 66)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 15:43:04 -0800 (PST)
I originally posted this to the newsgroup fa.info-cvs, but it appears to be oneway. Pardon if this is a repost. BRIEF == I invite discussion of a patch that I have made to CVS, but not yet released,
/archive/html/info-cvs/2002-10/msg00429.html (12,858 bytes)

20. Re: Comparison of two repositories? (score: 59)
Author: HIDDEN
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:55:33 -0700
Using GNU diffutils, the 'diff -x CVS -r dir1 dir2' with and optional -c for contex or -u for unified style diffs is how I typically do this kind of comparison. The '-x CVS' option tells GNU diff to
/archive/html/info-cvs/2003-09/msg00094.html (9,649 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu