[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer

From: Tassilo Horn
Subject: Re: [AUCTeX] preview vs beamer
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 08:42:57 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Nicolas Richard <address@hidden> writes:

Hi Nicolas,

>> address@hidden writes:
>>> | ! Undefined control sequence.
>>> | address@hidden@Output address@hidden@Shipout 
>>> |                                                   \box address@hidden 
>>> | l.5 \end{document}
>>> |                   
>> I can reproduce that but I don't know how to fix it. :-(
> I stumbled accross the very same problem today, when updating to TL2014
> (I was still with TL2012 before that).
> It seems that pgf is at fault, see :
> for a workaround.
> Now this raises a question : why would pgf try to fix a compatibility
> problem between preview and everyshi... I have no idea. They claim (in
> my pgfutil-latex.def file) :
> % Preview hack: preview.sty hacks into \shipout (which is ok), but
> % does not honour everyshi.sty (which is not ok). This causes everyshi
> % material to get lost.
> Perhaps preview-latex needs fixing in this area ? I don't know.

Me neither.  Maybe David can have a look at this issue.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]