Re: [AUCTeX] overlay prompting

[jfbu]

Le 24 janv. 2016 à 15:14, Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> a écrit :

> Hi Jean-François,
> 
> 2016-01-24 10:38 GMT+01:00 jfbu <address@hidden>:
>> Sorry for the delay. It was a very big file, with complicated
>> non-typical structure (thousands of lines before \documentclass),
>> and I should have focused on where "beamer" actually appeared in
>> the file, but did not have the time back then.
>> 
>> Your message seems to imply that the
>> following is unexpected:
>> 
>> % file testauctexparse.tex
>> \documentclass{article}
>> \begin{document}
>> % insert thousands of lines if you wish
>> \begin{verbatim}
>> \documentclass{beamer}
>> \end{verbatim}
>> \end{document}
>> 
>> Steps to reproduce:
>> 
>> 1. create the above file with extension .tex.
>> 
>> 2. Try C-cC-e and the default environment is "frame"
>> 
>> 3. Try an itemize environment and an Overlay spec will be ask for.
>> 
>> 4. The following testauctexparse.el file appears in auto/:
>> (possibly after an extra C-xC-s)
>> 
>> (TeX-add-style-hook
>> "testauctexparse"
>> (lambda ()
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-environments-local "semiverbatim")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperref")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperimage")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "hyperbaseurl")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "nolinkurl")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "url")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-braces-local "path")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local "url")
>>   (add-to-list 'LaTeX-verbatim-macros-with-delims-local "path")
>>   (TeX-run-style-hooks
>>    "latex2e"
>>    "article"
>>    "art10"
>>    "beamer"
>>    "beamer10")))
> 
> I was almost sure that code in verbatim environment was ignored during
> parsing, but I was completely wrong.  Reading the code, there is no
> such test and I think it's so for performance reasons.  The obvious
> fix would be to do said test, but I fear parsing time would increase
> sensibly.  I should do some tests.
> 
> For your specific problem, you can redefine
> `TeX-arg-beamer-overlay-spec' function to do nothing, at least while
> you work on that document.
> 
> Bye,
> Mosè

Hi Mosè

I stopped working on the document some days ago, which is why I could
make the report here finally ;-)

Thanks for the tip. Could the parsing possibly decide not to take
into account a second `\documentclass` ?

Bye,

Jean-François