[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Oct 2000 19:20:15 -0400 (EDT) |
Hello, David!
> I have found the offending statement :)
You are wonderful!
> if $ac_need_defaults; then
> : ${CONFIG_FILES=$config_files}
> fi
>
> Before this CONFIG_FILES is blank and config_files has the list of files.
> After this CONFIG_FILES has tests/atconfig and nothing else!
I wish that somebody found it before. This is extremely important for
Autoconf developers and needs to be worked around as soon as possible.
> if $ac_need_defaults; then
> CONFIG_FILES=$config_files
> fi
>
> Worked.
>
> I'm not sure this is real portable though :)
I think that the quotes around $config_files wouldn't hurt. Also you need
to check that CONFIG_FILES has not already been set.
Eureka, quotes! Could you please test this construct:
if $ac_need_defaults; then
: ${CONFIG_FILES="$config_files"}
fi
> Makefile:142: warning: overriding commands for target `//1/tmp/autoconf/.'
This must be something QNX specific.
> cd //1/tmp/autoconf/. . . && /bin/sh //1/tmp/autoconf/missing autoconf
> substitution too long
Weird.
> configure: error: source directory already configured; run "make distclean"
> there first
> make: *** [config.status] Error 1
Wild, wonderful world of QNX! Obviously, configure thinks that it's a
build with $srcdir != .
There is such line in configure:
if test "`cd $srcdir && pwd`" != "`pwd`" && test -f $srcdir/config.status; then
Please play with it and find what $srcdir is, why "pwd" outputs different
directories (or is is "cd" that produces some noice?)
> Ah the joys of QNX - where should I start to look for solving this then?
> The Makefile or the recheck?
It doesn't matter. Everything should be fixed before Automake-2.50 can be
released.
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, (continued)
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Pavel Roskin, 2000/10/19
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Ralf Corsepius, 2000/10/13
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/13
Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/19
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Lars J. Aas, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/20
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Alexandre Oliva, 2000/10/22
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/24
- Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, Akim Demaille, 2000/10/23
Re: Success (mostly) with the testsuite, David Morgan, 2000/10/20