[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule)
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 13:58:22 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Mike Castle <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:40:50 -0700
>
> Does that mean that autoconf should limit itself to
> the POSIX portable file name character set?
Of course. If Autoconf uses non-POSIX file names (other than as part
of a test for file name portability, or after such a test succeeds),
then that is a portability bug that should get fixed.
- Ebcdic rule, Pfeiffer Daniel, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Russ Allbery, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Eric Siegerman, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Harlan Stenn, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule),
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Earnie Boyd, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04