[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC quoting rules
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: AC quoting rules |
Date: |
05 Feb 2002 11:46:29 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp) |
>>>>> "Bruce" == Bruce Korb <address@hidden> writes:
Bruce> Ah, the light dimly dawns. We need M4 to support
Bruce> pushquote/popquote. It seems that would solve the issue.
It would solve nothing.
As a matter of fact, you should understand that changecom,
changequote, changeword and changesyntax are only command line options
which are moved into the M4 language. In other words, they are here
for you to adjust the rules of the binary to your application, period.
Using these guys during the execution is wrong.
This is really it: understand that the designers of m4 have moved many
things (see also tracemode etc.) which are fundamentally command line
options, into the language. This, of course, makes it easier to have
M4 libraries (they do not need a special set of options to be passed
to m4).
Any other use of change* is wrong. Once you have your *, don't change
it.
- Re: saving AC development strength, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/02
- Re: saving AC development strength, Erik Walthinsen, 2002/02/02
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/02
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/03
- Re: AC quoting rules,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/05
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Bruce Korb, 2002/02/06
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/07
- Re: AC quoting rules, Akim Demaille, 2002/02/11
- Re: AC quoting rules, Paul Eggert, 2002/02/11