[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_DEFINE questions
From: |
Jeff Squyres |
Subject: |
Re: AC_DEFINE questions |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Dec 2002 07:25:54 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2002, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > I'm not going to tell every one of my developers
> > that they need their own local installation of autoconf
>
> You don't need to do that. You can have a single directory that is
> shared by your developers, which contains tools like Autoconf. Your
> developers can be responsible for maintaining this directory, which they
> can prepend to their PATH.
Please re-read my previous posts. We *don't* have multiple installations
of autoconf -- our IT support staff has a single, globally accessible
installation. This is actually the central issue.
I made the above remark because someone made the suggestion / implication
that all of my developers could each have their own installation, and that
would avoid the "central IT support" problem.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} address@hidden
{+} Research Associate, Open Systems Lab, Indiana University
{+} http://www.osl.iu.edu/
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, (continued)
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Guido Draheim, 2002/12/12
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Jeff Squyres, 2002/12/12
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Jeff Squyres, 2002/12/12
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Guido Draheim, 2002/12/12
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Mike Castle, 2002/12/17
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Jeff Squyres, 2002/12/18
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Paul Eggert, 2002/12/19
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions,
Jeff Squyres <=
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Paul Eggert, 2002/12/20
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Dan Kegel, 2002/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Jeff Squyres, 2002/12/20
Re: AC_DEFINE questions, Mike Castle, 2002/12/17