[OT] reply-to (was: AC_FOREACH public?)

[Allan Clark]

Keith Marshall wrote:
> On Saturday 22 October 2005 10:08 am, Allan Clark wrote:
>   
> > You might want to consider switching to elm, mutt, or a Mozilla-based
> > client (if you're a graphical guy); they have these features, and are
> > fairly well-tested.
> >     
>
> I don't have any option to do this -- I am obliged by Company policy to use 
> Lotus Notes, which, while it does have a "Reply-to-All" option, it's badly 
> crippled, and fills the cc list with all sorts of rubbish.
>
> But "Reply-to-All" is *not* the most appropriate solution -- it's what I used 
> here, so *you* can have *two* copies of this message.
>   
great.  I've got two eyes.  These duplicates are statistical noise in 
the world of spam... and my inbox represents mail for me, my other boxes 
represent mail from the list.  I don't see the problem.  ...and I still 
have choice to "reply" or "reply-all".
> KMail works well for me at home, and offers all the flexibility I could ever 
> ask for, whether the "Reply-to" header points to the list or the originator 
> -- see my more detailed message on the subject.  Unfortunately, using Lotus 
> Notes at work, you guts are going to see me replying to you privately, when I 
> meant to reply to the list -- please feel free to forward such replies for me.
(or not)

Allan