Re: AC_SUBST and AC_CACHE_VAL

[Stefan Bienert]

Hi again,

> OK, but still the last line had no logical connection with the other
> ones, so I wondered whether we were missing something.

Oh, well, AC_SUBST should only be called, if the issue checked by
AC_CACHE_CHECK is true. I probably forgot to mention this either. Sorry.

> Old habit.  Use AS_CASE, please.  It makes a difference only if its
> arguments expand AC_REQUIRE statements.

As I thought. I always use AS_CASE/ AS_IF, makes live a little bit more
lazy...where is AS_FOR ;-)?

>> Isn't SB_FOOS empty if not initialised?

> Sure, but do you want it to be seedable or not?

What does "seedable" mean?

greetings,

Stefan