automake-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 12/10] More checks on warnings/strictness in precedence ("met


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/10] More checks on warnings/strictness in precedence ("metawarnings").
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 20:25:26 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 07:49:16PM CET:
> On Sunday 02 January 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 09:21:56PM CET:
> >
> > I'm not sure it works to put AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in an included macro.
> >
> Apparently it does, at least when only automake, aclocal and autoconf
> are involved.

Good then.

> I don't think so.  The test works also with autoconf 2.62, BTW.

> > > +$ACLOCAL --force
> > > +AUTOMAKE_fails -Werror -Wall --foreign
> > > +grep '^Makefile\.am:.*:=.*not portable' stderr
> > 
> > $sleep or remove autom4te.cache here.
> >
> Oops, I tought that "$ACLOCAL --force" was enough, but now I see from the
> output of "aclocal --help" that this is not the case :-(

Well yes, that is the gist of the bug report I still have to make.  ;-)

> Sorry for the noise.

No worries.

> > OK with that addressed.
> > 
> Below is what I squashed in.

OK, thanks,
Ralf



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]