[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-chat] Toolchain woes
From: |
Robert von Knobloch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-chat] Toolchain woes |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:06:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 |
On 01/10/10 07:20, address@hidden wrote:
> Robert von Knobloch <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> The script for avrfreaks' Bingo600 applies 14 patches, the first is
>> "patch-avr-libgcc.S" and it adds the lines that your patch (called
>> patch-newdevices) wants to find ( like: /* 3-Byte PC */). They are not
>> in the 'virgin' gcc 4.3.4 tarball.
>
> Yes, sure. The FreeBSD port's patches are meant to be applied in
> (alphabetical) order. It's virtually impossible to provide a set of
> patches that each would work on a virgin tree.
>
> As for your linker script, yes, it seems the internal architecture
> name for some CPUs has been changing over time, as the architecture
> "models" have been refined.
>
Thanks Jörg, everything is now clear.
I think that:
http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/user-manual/install__tools.html
should be corrected though. I doubt that I am the only one to fall for this.
Who might do that?
Robert