[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile"
|
From: |
Geoffrey Wossum |
|
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile" |
|
Date: |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 09:01:18 -0500 |
On Tue, 2005-04-19 at 20:53 -0700, stevech wrote:
> My Two Cents: Operating system functions like atomic access and mutual
> exclusion and multitasking do *not* belong in a programming language
> standard. The DoD tried it years ago with Ada and it was a huge failure.
And Sun tried it later with Java. Was that a huge failure, too?
---
Geoffrey Wossum
Long Range Systems - http://www.pager.net
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", David Kelly, 2005/04/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", David Brown, 2005/04/19
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", stevech, 2005/04/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", Colin Paul Gloster, 2005/04/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", E. Weddington, 2005/04/20
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] 'Volatile', Mike Murphree, 2005/04/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile",
Geoffrey Wossum <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", E. Weddington, 2005/04/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", David Brown, 2005/04/18
RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", Dave Hansen, 2005/04/15
Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", Douglas Dotson, 2005/04/15
Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", Graham Davies, 2005/04/15
RE: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", David Harper, 2005/04/15
Re: [avr-gcc-list] "Volatile", Dean Hall, 2005/04/17