Re: [avr-gcc-list] compiler function prologue/epilogue incorrect?

[craig]

On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:05:56PM +0200, Craig Schlenter wrote:
> I seem to have solved the gcc problem I had by forcing the compiler not
> to inline several functions ... gcc-3.3.2 never inlined the code but later
> versions did inline. Curiously the function prologue doesn't have this
> CLI construct in the non-inlined working version of the code but
> I haven't studied the assembly closely enough to be able to say for
> sure what was broken in the inlined version yet ...

Fixed it!!!! There was an assembler interrupt routine that was messing
with r29 without the appropriate push/pop (duh!) and since the
epilogue/prologue cached the stack pointer in r29 the stack pointer
was messed up. Boom.

The code runs happily now with/without inline etc. on a range of compiler
versions now that the real bug is fixed. Whew ...

bye,

--Craig