Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR LLVM backend?

[Dave N6NZ]

Weddington, Eric wrote:
>  
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 
> > address@hidden 
> > [mailto:address@hidden
> > org] On Behalf Of John Regehr
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 PM
> > To: David Brown
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: AVR LLVM backend?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure this is not an issue (anymore, at least).  I could be 
> > wrong.  The recently-added PIC port of LLVM would be a good 
> > place to start 
> > looking. 

Ummm... are you sure they mean PIC as in a processor from Microchip, or 
do they mean PIC as in Position Independent Code?

That particular collision in the acronym name space is a frequent cause 
of confusion among embedded developers....

-dave

> Oh, really?! I didn't know that they supported PIC.
> How interesting....
>
> > PIC is of course a particularly evil target.  I 
> > claim that if it 
> > can be supported at all, AVR should be easy :).
>
> ;-)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-GCC-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list