[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library

**From**: |
Colin O'Flynn |

**Subject**: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library |

**Date**: |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:44:42 -0400 |

**User-agent**: |
KMail/1.7.1 |

>* Sorry for the diversion, just meant to field a thought that may both*
>* simplify float routine implementations and use, although "non-standard".*
Perhaps this is something that we could just use #define's to work with? It
should be trivial to have a +inf put in place of a NaN, then there is the
option of compiling with either NaN generated or +inf.
Of course that is just more options, and it would be likely that it would be
never changed from the default value...
The only other problem: avr-libc doesn't support -0 I think (going from source
code comments), which would mean there could be no -inf option. The result of
+/- inf for a zero would be a logical option in some cases, but the result of
always +inf seems fairly useless to me.
Regards,
-Colin

**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *(continued)*
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Marek Michalkiewicz*, `2005/01/08`
*Message not available*
*Message not available*
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Marek Michalkiewicz*, `2005/01/08`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Bob Paddock*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Colin O'Flynn*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Paul Schlie*, `2005/01/09`
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**,
*Colin O'Flynn* **<=**
**Re: [avr-libc-dev] Bug in math library**, *Joerg Wunsch*, `2005/01/09`