avr-libc-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #28108] bug with winavr20090313


From: Szikra Istvan
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #28108] bug with winavr20090313
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 02:18:43 +0100

Hi all!

"Good" to see this bug again. I reported it at 2009-03-30 as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39593 .
Later it turned out to be a duplicate report of #37466 which was
marked fixed at 2008-09-12.
Interestingly WinAVR-20090313 still had tis bug (gcc 4.3.2)
good times :)

I just compiled my testcase (attached to #39593) with WinAVR-20100110
(gcc 4.3.3) and it seems OK. (If anyone still interested)

Sorry for replying to an old message.

By the way anyone knows why WinAVR is lagging behind gcc version?
If I'm not mistaken GCC 4.3.4 was released 2009-08-04, and 4.4.2 at 2009-10-15.
GCC 4.3.3 was released 2009-01-24 before WinAVR20090313 and it would
have been nice not to run into already fixed bugs...
Or maybe there's a tutorial how to compile your own winavr build with
latest gcc, binutils, libc?
(Something like http://www.devside.net/guides/windows/apache for Apache build)

-- 
Szikra Istvan


On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Jan Waclawek <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Follow-up Comment #4, bug #28108 (project avr-libc):
>
> This bug has been discussed extensively in the avrfreaks.net thread to which
> the link is given in the original bugreport.
>
> It has been confirmed that while the given code DOES result in erratic
> binary, reducing the given code results in correct code.
>
> It has also been noted that this *might* be the same error than
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37466  , which is said to be fixed
> in gcc 4.3.3
>
> So, some of the principal developers could perhaps try and confirm that gcc
> 4.3.3 fixes this bug, too. Then there's no point to submit a duplicate
> bugreport to an already fixed bug into the gcc bugtracker.
>
> JW
>
>    _______________________________________________________
>
> Reply to this item at:
>
>  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?28108>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Message sent via/by Savannah
>  http://savannah.nongnu.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-libc-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-libc-dev
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]