[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance.
From: |
Waldek Hebisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance. |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2007 15:20:17 +0200 (CEST) |
C Y wrote:
> > Clisp is also quite portable, so it is possible that CCL offers
> > no advantages over clisp (but this requires more analysis).
>
> I think the main issue there is the performance of Clisp, which IIRC is
> quite slow compared to CMUCL et. al.
>
Well, slow program gets answers faster than program which does not
work at all. CCL/Clisp are good solutions is situations when
gcl/sbcl/cmucl do not work.
Both Clisp and CCL are bytecode interpreters, so for can not be very
fast, but are faster than many folks would think hearing "interpreter".
ATM I can not say which one is faster CCL or clisp.
--
Waldek Hebisch
address@hidden
- [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Stephen Wilson, 2007/05/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Waldek Hebisch, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., C Y, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance.,
Waldek Hebisch <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., C Y, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Stephen Wilson, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Stephen Wilson, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] CCL maintenance., Stephen Wilson, 2007/05/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Martin Rubey, 2007/05/31
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Martin Rubey, 2007/05/31
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Mike Dewar, 2007/05/31
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gernot Hueber, 2007/05/31