[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:11:56 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> I've just noticed that I'm not being so consistent with how I choose where
> to add test cases. Should all bugs be demonstrated in regression.at? Or
> is it better to be more specific when another set, like input.at, makes
> sense?
I prefer the latter, as it has better long-term implications, but it's
not a huge deal either way.