[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: fix %start after first rule |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:14:31 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I've just noticed that I'm not being so consistent with how I choose where
> > to add test cases. Should all bugs be demonstrated in regression.at? Or
> > is it better to be more specific when another set, like input.at, makes
> > sense?
>
> I prefer the latter, as it has better long-term implications, but it's
> not a huge deal either way.
That's my thinking as well... when I can remember.
Thanks.
Joel