[bongo-devel] Re: Binding `g' to `bongo-play'

[Daniel Jensen]

Daniel Brockman <address@hidden> writes:

> I think playing deserves a better binding than `C-c RET'.
> Now that `g' is free, what about binding it to `bongo-play'?

How about `o'? (For "open" or someting.) Not that `g' is particularly
bad, I'm just throwing the idea out.

> When browsing around using `p' and `n', it is a minor pain to
> have to reach for `RET' (even `C-m' is a teeny-weeny pain).

I hope you're not considering removing the `RET' binding.

Daniel, have you been using vi lately? This worries me.