[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test framework; new counter class
From: |
Albert Strasheim |
Subject: |
Re: Test framework; new counter class |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:06:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hello,
I think UberCounter (renamed to Counter) should go into 1.1. Depending
on how seamless you want the upgrade to be, one might consider renaming
the existing counters to something like Old[CounterName], marking
them as deprecated, and keeping them a while longer.
I guess interface changes are painful, but that's the price you have to
pay sometimes.
Let me know how you want me to proceed.
Cheers,
Albert
On Thu, 02 Jan 2003, David Sugar wrote:
> In the 1.1 release, would it just make more sense to call this Counter and
> use
> it in place of what we have in current 1.0.x dists?
>
> On Thursday 02 January 2003 07:09, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Attached is a patch that contains the latest version of UberCounter and
> > friends, the proposed test framework, and some minor other bits and
> > pieces.
> >
> > I've cleaned up the UberCounter, UberMutexCounter, and UberAtomicCounter
> > documentation since the previous patch.
> >
> > On the test framework front, I've added a custom TestListener class that
> > will allow us to customize the output of the CppUnit test program.
> >
> > Finally, there are some minor updates to the MAINTAINERCLEANFILES lists
> > in some of the Makefile.am files.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Albert
- Re: Test framework; new counter class, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/02
- Re: Test framework; new counter class, David Sugar, 2003/01/02
- RE: Test framework; new counter class, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; new counter class, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, David Sugar, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, David Sugar, 2003/01/03