[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0
From: |
Albert Strasheim |
Subject: |
Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0 |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Jan 2003 16:42:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Hello,
On Fri, 03 Jan 2003, Albert Strasheim wrote:
> Seems you want to provide a Thread class implemented on top of Pth?
> Isn't the pthread_* code always going to be inferior to this
> implementation?
I am a bit mistaken here. Seems Pth uses the exact same function names,
etc., so the existing code remains unmodified? And you can decide if you
want to link against Pth, or just straight glibc (at least on Linux).
And then on platforms with some weird thread library, you now get
existing code to compile by using Pth. Sweet.
Cheers,
Albert
- Re: Test framework; new counter class, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/02
- Re: Test framework; new counter class, David Sugar, 2003/01/02
- RE: Test framework; new counter class, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, David Sugar, 2003/01/03
- RE: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Albert Strasheim, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework; and what should be in 1.1.0, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/17
- RE: Test framework, Chad Yates, 2003/01/03
- Re: Test framework, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/17
- RE: Test framework, Chad Yates, 2003/01/17
- Re: Test framework, Federico Montesino Pouzols, 2003/01/18