[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:08:14 +0200 |
Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
> Well I was thinking it would be more efficient than polling
> as the number of files monitored was increased. How about:
>
> tail --follow now uses inotify when possible, to be more responsive
> to file changes and also be more efficient when many files are monitored.
Sounds good.
s/also be// and here's a tweak to use active voice:
tail --follow now uses inotify when possible, to be more responsive
to file changes and more efficient when monitoring many files.
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, (continued)
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/07
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/11
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/13
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/14
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/15
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Pádraig Brady, 2009/06/25
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/06
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2009/06/06
- Re: inotify back end for tail -f on linux, Jim Meyering, 2009/06/07