[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k
|
From: |
Linda Walsh |
|
Subject: |
bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 02 Jun 2013 12:04:16 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird |
Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 02:54 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
>> ... removing features that exceeded posix
>
> As I explained to you in my previous message, no features
> were removed. Merely the option syntax was changed.
Ah...I'm sorry, I misunderstood. I thought I read that
it didn't apply to the long listing format.
My bad for not reading carefully enough.
Thank you for your patience...
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Pádraig Brady, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda A. Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/01
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Paul Eggert, 2013/06/02
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?,
Linda Walsh <=
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Eric Blake, 2013/06/04
- bug#14525: ls -k produced no size, ls -lk lists in bytes? What's up w/k?, Linda Walsh, 2013/06/06