Re: [bug-gawk] Behavior of fflush with SIGPIPE on stdout [PATCH]

[arnold]

"Andrew J. Schorr" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Fair enough, but should the trivial ignore_sigpipe() and
> set_sigpipe_to_default() functions perhaps be inline functions in awk.h?

I suppose they could be. I don't like having too many functions
in awk.h. These aren't called that often.  I'll think about it.

Thanks,

Arnold