[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation
From: |
Imran Ghory |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Feb 2001 20:43:03 -0000 |
On 25 Feb 2001, at 8:31, Tom Chance wrote:
> Indeed we can.
>
> As for processing power, unless we use a single PII
> 450 to do the serving, I'm not sure processing power
> is going to be much of a problem. Especially if we use
> Perl, because then we can use a small bank of
> interpreters to do the number crunching, and a main
> computer to act as the "gateway", to hold the info
> etc.
I think we should avoid unnecessary cost. Why need 100
computers when we could do the same with a handfull ?
> We shouldn't offload our problems onto the users,
> we should solve them all ourselves.
Go and tell address@hidden that :-)
Imran
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Bob Dodd, 2001/02/24
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Bob Dodd, 2001/02/24
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Imran Ghory, 2001/02/24
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Tom Chance, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Imran Ghory, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Hook, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Tom Chance, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Hook, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Tom Chance, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Hook, 2001/02/25
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation,
Imran Ghory <=
- Re: [Bug-gne]A suggestion for reformulation, Tom Chance, 2001/02/27