[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedica
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Jun 2011 09:15:25 -0700 |
> I downloaded your Icicles tarball and tried with throw-10. Everything
> seems to work as expected including focus redirection and resurrection
> of an iconified Completions frame.
There should be no iconfied Completions frame in the test I gave you.
The problem arises only when the Completions frame is newly _created_, as I
tried to explain. If you use `M-x f TAB o' (recipe) after the frame has already
been created then the input focus is not a problem.
If you have the frame already, then please delete it and try `M-x f TAB o'
again.
> So if you don't use any additional strings the problem seems
> fixed. I can't tell why it doesn't work on your machine.
As I said, it's possible that this is Windows-specific. Windows is I think
(thought) a bit peculiar when it comes to its auto-selecting a new frame - but
you said that most window mgrs do that now. I still wonder if this isn't
Windows-specific, since you cannot reproduce it and it is systematic for me when
I follow the same recipe.
> Maybe some .el files have to be recompiled in order to work
> with my later fixes
Do you mean my .el or .el from Emacs sources? In the files I provided for the
test, please use only .el, no .elc.
> so it's likely best to wait till Sean uploads the new binaries
> (IIRC this happens every Monday). As soon as you tried with
> the new binaries tell me what you get.
I'll certainly do that.
But what about that `display-buffer' call in
`icicle-display-candidates-in-Completions'? Can you suggest a change for it?
Does that code look like it _should_ work after your changes, or should it be
changed?
And you mentioned the `save-selected-window' around that `display-buffer' call.
Does that need to be changed somehow?
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, (continued)
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/21
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/23
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/24
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/24
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated,
Drew Adams <=
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/25
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, martin rudalics, 2011/06/26
- bug#8856: 24.0.50; regression: special-display-frame is no longer dedicated, Drew Adams, 2011/06/26