|
From: | Holger |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win32 builds - new set of DLL |
Date: | Tue, 01 Jul 2003 16:13:36 +0200 |
At 15:55 01.07.2003 +0200, Nardy Pillards wrote:
For the time being, I propose to copy zlib-1.dll to zlib.dll and put it in the gnubg directory. That way the libpng calls to zlib within gnubg will be made to that zlib(-1).dll. (and thus: replace zlib.dll with that copied zlib-1.dll in the Installation Archive also)
This renaming eventually only complicates matters. But I don't have a better solution.
BTW: I don't think it is needed to put -zl in makefile, since gnubg is independent of zlib. (Can someone confirm this? If not, I will check one of those days).
Hmm, you may have a point here as it's not directly dependant. But I'm not really well versed in compiler and linker stuff. Somebody else?
Regards,Holger
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |