[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
## RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph

**From**: |
Albert Silver |

**Subject**: |
RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph |

**Date**: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2003 19:59:32 -0300 |

>* > I think this is hyperbole. What I asked for, whether it is done or*
not,
>* > is not nearly so specialized.*
>* *
>* Well, I think it was. My example about gammon prices was just a*
>* generalisation of this: it doesn't make sense to look at -7,-7 and*
-9,-9
>* seperately as they have almost the same gammon price.*
I'm on my way out, so will only be able to answer later now. Just as a
comment: that's why I only asked for scores of 5-point matches from
5-away 5-away to DMP. It cover the most common scores played that bring
real differences such as 2-away 4-away, DMP, 2-away 3-away, etc. More
than that *would* be too specialized IMO as well.
Albert

**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *(continued)*
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Joseph Heled*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Joern Thyssen*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`
**RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Albert Silver*, `2003/08/29`
**RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`
**RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Albert Silver*, `2003/08/29`
**RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Joern Thyssen*, `2003/08/29`
**RE: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**,
*Albert Silver* **<=**
*Message not available**Message not available***Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Joseph Heled*, `2003/08/29`
**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Joern Thyssen*, `2003/08/30`

**Re: [Bug-gnubg] Match statistics graph**, *Holger*, `2003/08/29`