[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface

From: Joern Thyssen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 14:13:57 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/

On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Marco van Tol wrote
> On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Jon Kinsey wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure about using python to access the database.  It wasn't a 
> > problem as there is a pysqlite module, I just don't think it's 
> > necessary.  To put it another way, it adds a dependency that isn't 
> > strictly required.  I imagine the code could easily be changed so that 
> > the database access is in the C layer and the python code changed to use 
> > this.  Is there any other reason to use python for this?
> Perhaps more to give a signal of life then to contribute something useful:
> I'm a bit curious to know the answer to this as well. :)
> I actually currently compile gnubg on my FreeBSD machine with
> 'WITHOUT_PYTHON' so it doesn't consume _all available cpu_ even while not
> really doing anything. Not sure if that's FreeBSD specific though.

that's a weird problem... Are you sure that it is python that consumes
CPU time?  I'm guesing that it's a GTK+ problem...


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]