[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused
From: |
Ian Shaw |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Jun 2015 17:04:14 +0000 |
Spot on, that's what I was looking for.
-- Ian
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Petch [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 15 June 2015 16:50
To: Ian Shaw; address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused
On 2015-06-15 8:39 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
> scientifically cautious?
Yes. The only study I am aware of was the Deprelli one and I personally do feel
that there is a definite trend in the error rate that indicate that the
even/odd ply effect has been reduced. But it was one study. I do remain
optimistic that over a greater number of positions the trend would hold in bot
play.
This post (and the thread in general) of Philippe's may give you a better idea:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnubg/2012-06/msg00032.html
--
Michael Petch
GNU Backgammon Maintainer / Developer
OpenPGP FingerPrint=D81C 6A0D 987E 7DA5 3219 6715 466A 2ACE 5CAE 3304
- [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Michael Brennan, 2015/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Ian Shaw, 2015/06/11
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Lucas, 2015/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Ian Shaw, 2015/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Ian Shaw, 2015/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Michael Petch, 2015/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Ian Shaw, 2015/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Michael Petch, 2015/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused,
Ian Shaw <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Philippe Michel, 2015/06/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Ian Shaw, 2015/06/16
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Philippe Michel, 2015/06/22
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Philippe Michel, 2015/06/12
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Confused, Philippe Michel, 2015/06/12