[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: memmem issues

From: Jim Meyering
Subject: Re: memmem issues
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:22:19 +0100

"Bruno Haible" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Paul Eggert wrote:
>> section
>> ...
>> Here again, the intent is that memcmp(&x, &y, sizeof (T)) compares all
>> the bits in the underlying representation.  The only way to do that
>> portably is via "unsigned char *".
> OK. Here's a proposed patch for the memmem function.

Your patch didn't reach the list.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]