[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:34:41 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20071114) |
Way back on Sep 06, you wrote:
> IMHO, changing sort -V to produce more intuitively-correct results
> is the way to go
Well, as the author and contributor of the ``sort -V'' hack
I do have to agree. Since changing glibc is not happening,
I recommend using the putative verrevcmp() in sort(1) instead.
:) Cheers - Bruce
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, (continued)
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Ian Jackson, 2008/09/29
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Ian Jackson, 2008/09/29
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Kamil Dudka, 2008/09/29
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Ian Jackson, 2008/09/30
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Ian Jackson, 2008/09/30
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Kamil Dudka, 2008/09/30
- Re: willing to contribute verrevcmp to gnulib?, Ian Jackson, 2008/09/29
- Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage, Jim Meyering, 2008/09/22
- Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage, Eric Blake, 2008/09/22
- Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage, Kamil Dudka, 2008/09/22
Re: Issue with ls -v / sort -V and strverscmp() usage,
Bruce Korb <=