Re: [Bug-gnupress] Using GCC - Proofreader's Role (newbie)

[Lisa M. Opus Goldstein]

This length sounds fine, and the three pages should give us plenty of
breathing room.  If we do go over by a few, that is fine also.  Our
current publishing method does not use signatures.

So, no need to worry about it!

-Lisa







Simon Law <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 03:15:59PM -0400, James Howison wrote:
> > I am concentrating on two things - readability, logical consistency and 
> > saving space.
> > 
> > I'm fairly sure that Lisa indicated that saving space is an important 
> > part of this process as the more pages the more expensive to print and 
> > ship - yet there is a limit to the prices that can be charged which 
> > does not relate to the page count.
> >
> > So I'm providing aggressive and moderate options for saving space in my 
> > sections.
> > 
> > Is that correct Lisa?
> 
>       I don't think that editing can significantly reduce our page
> count.  Right now, it is at 381, which is 24 signatures of 16 pages
> each.  Our upper limit is 384 pages before we pop another signature in.
> 
>       If you feel like reworking, that would probably be something to
> ask about on the GCC mailing lists.
> 
> Simon
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupress mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupress

-- 
Lisa M. Goldstein           address@hidden
Managing Editor, GNU Press  www.gnupress.org
Business Manager,           Tel 617-542-5942
Free Software Foundation    Fax 617-542-2652