[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
From: |
Mario Klebsch |
Subject: |
Re: Time to fork the netboot code? |
Date: |
Wed, 9 May 2001 19:05:28 +0200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wednesday, 9. May 2001 08:53, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to OKUJI Yoshinori:
> > > > So transition to a more powerful set of device drivers
> > > > would be necessary.
> > >
> > > Hm. Has anyone started on this?
> >
> > No, AFAIK. However, you cannot do this alone. It is necessary to
> > implement real memory management and handle protected-mode
> > interrupts and real-mode ones concurrently, using v86-mode. That is
> > exactly the plan which should be done after 1.0 release.
>
> OK, good to know. I do have some short-term goals which can only be
> met by further hacking on the Etherboot drivers.
Just out of interest:
How much do the netboot (etherboot?) developers know about grub? Did
they ever use their drivers with grub?
If I understood the code right, the etherboot people are calling the
functions in config.c, which is then calling the various drivers.
I think, it should be possible to change the interface between config.c
and the network drivers to better fit grub's needs. Grub could use the
drivers either through config.c (in this case probably nothing is won)
or using the new interface. etherboot could either continue to use the
config.c interface or merge this code with the rest of their project
and switch to the new interface, too.
The goal would be to convert the situation from
the grub people using the drivers of the etherboot people
to
the grub and etherboot people are using common drivers.
73, Mario
- --
Mario Klebsch address@hidden
PGP-Key available at http://www.klebsch.de/public.key
Fingerprint DSS: EE7C DBCC D9C8 5DC1 D4DB 1483 30CE 9FB2 A047 9CE0
Diffie-Hellman: D447 4ED6 8A10 2C65 C5E5 8B98 9464 53FF 9382 F518
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: lmiHhpwTLGOGJ6fz5SnKnpx/CmLp7VCu
iQA/AwUBOvl43jDOn7KgR5zgEQInewCfXdq2gIPW8k712chP2qUcZvTVmNMAn2x6
fGIb3z2IC9E6wGrVXPRYVYgu
=cXks
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/07
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/08
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/08
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?,
Mario Klebsch <=
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Christoph Plattner, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Matthias Granberry, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, sese granola, 2001/05/10