[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Time to fork the netboot code?
From: |
Mario Klebsch |
Subject: |
Re: Time to fork the netboot code? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2001 22:49:11 +0200 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thursday, 10. May 2001 21:36, OKUJI Yoshinori wrote:
> From: Mario Klebsch <address@hidden>
> I think our situation is very similar to this case. Normal OS drivers
> have (maybe a lot of) extra code for us, but they have features
> enough for us. They are designed to be used simultaneously (opposed
> to Etherboot), and they very often work better than Etherboot,
> because of the number of the users/developers. Anyway, most of GRUB
> users use GRUB to boot Linux and/or *BSD, so if their drivers don't
> work with their NICs, it isn't very important that GRUB works with
> their NICs. In addition, AFAIK, there is no card that works better
> with Etherboot than Linux or *BSD.
Ok, so what shall be our goal?
Using existing Linux/*BSD drivers as they are in Linux/*BSD (in
doubt use exiting kernel modules, since not all kernel modules are
available in source)? (This is the using Linux/*BSD-driver aproach)
Or
Modify the existing Linux/*BSD drivers (and our own environment as
well) to work with Linux/*BSD as well as with grub and persuade the
Linux/*BSD people to keep these modified drivers as part of their
system (This is the 'sharing the driver' aproach)?
I think, we should agree on this, so that everybody can work into the
right direction.
As I wrote in an erlier mail, I do not think, any of these two
aproaches is technically impossible. The main problem probably is to
get the teams work together.
73, Mario
- --
Mario Klebsch address@hidden
PGP-Key available at http://www.klebsch.de/public.key
Fingerprint DSS: EE7C DBCC D9C8 5DC1 D4DB 1483 30CE 9FB2 A047 9CE0
Diffie-Hellman: D447 4ED6 8A10 2C65 C5E5 8B98 9464 53FF 9382 F518
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
MessageID: uws0fI+FxzDYEzGm09rMJE6BA3T42s1y
iQA/AwUBOvr+zTDOn7KgR5zgEQJtHACdHDghQz0Uhfil79hPrCN7D2u9ijIAmwS0
sm5AL/hnfmI1jV1ZoOkbB2sV
=MlxO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, (continued)
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Chip Salzenberg, 2001/05/09
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Christoph Plattner, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Mario Klebsch, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, OKUJI Yoshinori, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?,
Mario Klebsch <=
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Matthias Granberry, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, sese granola, 2001/05/10
- Re: Time to fork the netboot code?, Thierry Laronde, 2001/05/09
RE: Time to fork the netboot code?, Gregg C Levine, 2001/05/08