[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revision control
From: |
Michael Banck |
Subject: |
Re: Revision control |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:47:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:11:20PM +0200, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
> No powerful tool can be properly used without understanding it.
The point is: The Hurd doesn't need a powerful source control tool, it
just needs something which is much better than CVS and usable by all
possible contributors.
Once the Hurd has reached 1/100 of the RCS traffic of Linux, a switch to
a powerful tool might be feasable.
Michael
- Re: Revision control, (continued)
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/10
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/11
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/17
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/23
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/26
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/26
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/28
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/28
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/29
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/30
- Re: Revision control,
Michael Banck <=
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/18
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/19
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/19
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/20
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/22
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/23
Re: Revision control, Ivan Shmakov, 2008/06/04