[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revision control
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: Revision control |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:46:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:47:04PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> The point is: The Hurd doesn't need a powerful source control tool, it
> just needs something which is much better than CVS and usable by all
> possible contributors.
>
> Once the Hurd has reached 1/100 of the RCS traffic of Linux, a switch
> to a powerful tool might be feasable.
That's like saying that it's only useful to run GNU/Linux on very large
servers, because others don't need the power...
There is probably a difference between a project with a single
contributor, and a project with more than one. But otherwise, the size
or activity of a project has very little influence on what kind of
things the developers need or want to do regarding version control.
-antrik-
- Re: Revision control, (continued)
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/11
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/17
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/23
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/26
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/26
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/28
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/28
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/29
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/30
- Re: Revision control, Michael Banck, 2008/06/17
- Re: Revision control,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/19
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/19
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/20
- Re: Revision control, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/06/22
- Re: Revision control, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/06/23
Re: Revision control, Ivan Shmakov, 2008/06/04