[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
[bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing |
Date: |
Sat, 1 Sep 2007 22:28:29 +0200 (CEST) |
>> Secondly, is it possible for add_history to be in libreadline.so
>> instead of libhistory.so on GNU systems? Or in other terms why
>> should we check for add_history in both libreadline _and_
>> libhistory?
> I don't see why it would help to test for add_history in
> libreadline.
It might be in libreadline, as is the case for GNU Readline.
http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg52955.html
tells me that OpenBSD has add_history in libreadline instead of
libhistory. Do we want to use OpenBSD's libreadline or just stick
to GNU's?
I fail to see what the problem is, just do:
Test if add_history is in libreadline, if it is not, test if it is in
libhistory, else do not use add_history.
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/01
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/02
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/02
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/03
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray, 2007/09/05
- [bug-inetutils] Re: ftp: command processing, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2007/09/05