|
From: | lilypond |
Subject: | Re: Issue 1303 in lilypond: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax. |
Date: | Sun, 24 Oct 2010 15:55:18 +0000 |
Updates: Status: Duplicate Mergedinto: 923Comment #6 on issue 1303 by n.puttock: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303 This is a duplicate of issue 923.The notes without legers are slightly further to the right, which means the stencil calculation for TrillSpanner can add an extra squiggle (thus triggering outside-staff avoidance.)
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |