|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: PDF docs for 2.19.82 broken/missing fonts |
Date: | Wed, 27 Jun 2018 16:44:58 +0100 |
-- Phil Holmes"David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message news:address@hidden
Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:
Would you show us the GUB's whole lilypond-doc log file? If you preserve the 2.19.81 (Jan. 2018) lilypond-doc log file, I'd like to compare the 2.19.82 log file (broken PDFs) and the 2.19.81 log file (correct PDFs).Zipped versions of both log files are attached. Hope this helps.To me both logs prove that building of e.g. the english notation.pdf succeeded and that the survival of the original pdf generated by xetex is impossible. Unfortunately reality proves something different.
Can it be verified whether or not the logs stem from a run actually producing the respective valid and/or invalid PDF files or not? --David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |