Re: [certi-dev] CERTI performance issue

[Eric Noulard]

I add some practical suggestion in order to
bring those "second generation" time management algorithm into CERTI.

2009/5/29 Pierre Siron <address@hidden>:
> Would you tell me your ideas about the second generation approach.
>
> Ok,
> I can try to develop that.
>
> What is the case that we could try to solve ?
> The federation includes n federates in coordinated time,
> we have n pending nextEventRequest (Ti)
> and small lookaheads (Ti).

We should develop a test federation (which may be added to HLA Tests Suite)
which follow this pattern. Ideally it would consists in 1 executable
which takes as many command line options as needed in order
to fullfill its role in the targeted pattern.

for example:

FedNextGenTM --fom=blah.fed --fedname="NextGenTMFederation" --name
"Fed1" --lookahead=0.5 --ner-step=10

which would launch one federate using "blah.fed" FOM file, the
federation name is "NextGenTMFederation"
the federate name is "Fed1", lookahead 0.5 and issue NER request with step 10.

Michael may be you can give us a more thorough description of your
testcase, which may
I would suggest to document the test case using some kind of MSC description
(may be incomplete but sufficient information).

I join an example using mscgen (http://www.mcternan.me.uk/mscgen/)
which present the advantage of being usable on both unix and windows
and it could be embedded in doxygen source code documentation.

try:
mscgen -T png -i HLA-TimeCreep.txt -o HLA-TimeCreep.png

> I find difficult to build a distributed snapshot of the distributed
> simulation because :
> - This requires a complex distributed algorithm (that we can find
> in the literature) and a new amount of messages.
> - This construction must be done periodically (which rhythm ?)
> or asynchronously (which event ?).
>
> We have won if a process (respectively all the processes) identifies
> the situation and then causes a long jump in the time (an advance
> to the min of Ti + Li).

[...]

No comment on this on my side now.

What I will do is to open a task on the Savannah tracker for that
"Implementing second generation time management"
(once Savannah has come back) and I invite interested people
to comment on the task tracker.

public discussion should off-course continue on the ML but it
may be easier to attach files/patch to the tracker than sending those
directly on the ML.

For people who want to contribute we (CERTI current developer)
will give support for the newcomers who wants to get knowledge of the
CERTI internals.

Do not hesitate to dive into the CERTI code and/or provide patch.

I would say that the first step would be to design and implement
the portable test federation.
In the meantime we continue to discuss the techncal solution.
Then volunteer goes on with patch for supporting the chosen solution in CERTI.


-- 
Erk

HLA-TimeCreep.txt
Description: Text document

HLA-TimeCreep.png
Description: PNG image