[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology

From: Sunnan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Eggology
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:41:10 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070604)

Benedikt Rosenau wrote:
Anyway, I propose the following: please keep dependencies between
eggs small.
I disagree; sometimes, it seems better to split common code to libraries than to have duplication. Dependencies can be hell, but so can duplication.

 Further, no mutual dependencies (A needs B, and B needs
A) should be created.
I guess I can agree with that. If that should happen, here are two solutions to that:
1) create a third package, C, with the stuff from A that B depends on, so that A depends on B and C, and B depends on C, or:
2) join the two packages.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]