[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?
From: |
felix winkelmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib? |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:58:38 +0100 |
On Feb 17, 2008 1:46 AM, Matt Gushee <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Does string= in Chicken return an integer because it is considered
> more useful than #t? And if so, how? Or was it simply easier to
> implement the function that way?
>
It does this because chicken uses the reference implementation code
originally by Olin Shivers. A decision that I greatly regret, as there were
many bugs and the API generally is pretty uninspired.
So, it isn't intentionally that way, it's just what the code does.
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Elf, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Elf, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?,
felix winkelmann <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Matt Gushee, 2008/02/16
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Kon Lovett, 2008/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Jim Ursetto, 2008/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, felix winkelmann, 2008/02/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] Bug in SRFI-13 lib?, Kon Lovett, 2008/02/16