[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SWING at OJE
From: |
Nic Ferrier |
Subject: |
Re: SWING at OJE |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Feb 2001 00:32:01 +0000 |
>>> "Rolf W. Rasmussen" <address@hidden> 06-Feb-01 12:19:17 AM >>>
>I think he stated that he also used reflection to
>gather information used generate the stubs.
>If so, we're no longer on safe ground. The reflection
>API has the ability to scan classes and members that
>are not part of the public API, and are not strictly
>needed to create a conforming/interoperable
>implementation.
Sorry! I missed that bit.
You're quite right. Using reflection would invalidate the legality of
the clean room effort.
>Whether any expression deserving copyright protection
>is being carried over in Andrew's case is something that
>I haven't got the legal insight to judge.
Sure... doesn't matter anyway. The reflection brings the judges
hammer down.
Nic
- Re: SWING at OJE, (continued)
- Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
- RE: SWING at OJE, Andrew Selkirk, 2001/02/05
- Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
- Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
- Re: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
- RE: SWING at OJE, Andrew Selkirk, 2001/02/05
- RE: SWING at OJE, Nic Ferrier, 2001/02/05
- Re: SWING at OJE,
Nic Ferrier <=